The Engineer hasn't made an appearance in Battlefield since 4. It's duties are now partly the Assault class and the Support class. Yet I think that adding in the Engineer class could be healthy to the game. Right now, there seems to be a distaste with the squad size being lowered from 5 to 4. I played very actively during the BF3 days and was used to 4 squad members. My problem with BF4, and many would agree, was that it had 5 man squads for only 4 roles. Why can't we have a battlefield game with all 5 roles?The Engineer class could be unique in a few ways. Dues to some recent leaks, it would be cool to have the primary weapons be Carbines, and the secondary being the machine pistol rather than a normal pistol. They could carry a limpet, at mines, anti-tank grenade, flare gun, maybe a mortar? A choice between a smoke, sticky, or incendiary grenade. I know the support class has the ability to build fortifications faster and repair vehicles but so could the Engineer. 2 out of 5 sounds like a good ratio for classes with better repair tools.
No comments:
Post a Comment